
Nobody was a bigger Elm Street fan than I was, back in the day.
I paid to see every film in the theater (sometimes more than once) and owned every film on VHS.
I had a poster of Freddy on my closet door.
I wanted to be his girlfriend.
Yes, I am disturbed - deeply disturbed.
But I gotta say...this 2010 remake may not be such a bad idea.
Look, obviously no one is ever going to replace Robert Englund as Freddy, but if it were anyone but Jackie Earle Haley who had agreed to take it on, I'd be a lot more dubious.
I'm thinking of Haley's Krueger as being a cross between Rorschach and Kelly Leak: all of the angry intensity of the adult vigilante combined with the immature hormonal perversity of his Bad News Bears persona. Plus, he's got that whole Short Man thing going on.
And I gotta be honest: I sat down and watched the first Elm Street just a week or two ago and, really, it hasn't aged very well. Freddy himself remains perfect, but the storyline and characters seem to have disintegrated around him. A lot of the acting is woodenly awful, especially from Heather Langenkamp and Ronee Blakely. And that ending? I thought it was retarded the first time I saw it.
There are, of course, a plethora of seminal images from the original which can never be improved upon: the shot of Freddy's elongated arms in the alleyway, the sight of Tina's body being dragged through the school hallways, even the sound effects remain genuinely creepy - a mixture of human screams and lambs bleats. But overall, the basic story could stand an airing out and a dusting off. In the right hands, it could even be one of those rare creatures: a remake that's actually not crap.
April 16, 2010 is the scheduled release date.
Cross yer fingers.